api,simple: new 'multiplex' setting in bearer properties
Both the Simple.Connect() and Modem.CreateBearer() are updated to allow a new 'multiplex' setting in the properties provided by the user in both of these methods. The new setting expects a MMBearerMultiplexSupport enum indicating what kind of multiplex needs the user has: * none: if multiplex must not be used. * requested: if multiplex should be used if available. * required: if multiplex must be used. The underlying implementations will take care of accepting or rejecting the setting depending on the system and modem capabilities.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -109,6 +109,13 @@
|
||||
value (signature <literal>"u"</literal>).
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
<varlistentry><term><literal>"multiplex"</literal></term>
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
Multiplex support requested by the user, given as a
|
||||
<link linkend="MMBearerMultiplexSupport">MMBearerMultiplexSupport</link>
|
||||
value (signature <literal>"u"</literal>). Since 1.18.
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
</variablelist>
|
||||
-->
|
||||
<method name="Connect">
|
||||
|
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@
|
||||
<listitem><para>Protocol of the Rm interface, given as a <link linkend="MMModemCdmaRmProtocol">MMModemCdmaRmProtocol</link> value (signature <literal>"u"</literal>). Optional in CDMA.</para></listitem></varlistentry>
|
||||
<varlistentry><term><literal>"number"</literal></term>
|
||||
<listitem><para>Number to dial for the data connection, given as a string value (signature <literal>"s"</literal>). Deprecated since version 1.10.0.</para></listitem></varlistentry>
|
||||
<varlistentry><term><literal>"multiplex"</literal></term>
|
||||
<listitem><para>Multiplex support requested by the user, given as a <link linkend="MMBearerMultiplexSupport">MMBearerMultiplexSupport</link> value (signature <literal>"u"</literal>). Since 1.18.</para></listitem></varlistentry>
|
||||
</variablelist>
|
||||
|
||||
Some properties are only applicable to a bearer of certain access
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user