A NetworkManager client requires an API to validate and decode
a base64 secret -- like it is used by WireGuard. If we don't have
this as part of the API, it's inconvenient. Expose it.
Rename it from _nm_utils_wireguard_decode_key(), to give it a more
general name.
Also, rename _nm_utils_wireguard_normalize_key() to
nm_utils_base64secret_normalize(). But this one we keep as internal
API. The user will care more about validating and decoding the base64
key. To convert the key back to base64, we don't need a public API in
libnm.
This is another ABI change since 1.16-rc1.
(cherry picked from commit e46ba01867)
According to documentation, this returns a boolean indicating whether
the value is valid. Previously, it was indicating whether the instance
was modified.
Together with the @accept_invalid argument, both behaviors make some
sense. Change it, because that is also how the other setters behave.
(cherry picked from commit f3ac8c6fe8)
This is an API break since 1.16-rc1.
The functions like _nm_utils_wireguard_decode_key() are internal API
and not accessible to a libnm user. Maybe this should be public API,
but for now it is not.
That makes it cumbersome for a client to validate the setting. The client
could only reimplement the validation (bad) or go ahead and set invalid
value.
When setting an invalid value, the user can afterwards detect it via
nm_wireguard_peer_is_valid(), but at that point, it's not clear which
exact property is invalid.
First I wanted to keep the API conservative and not promissing too much.
For example, not promising to do any validation when setting the key.
However, libnm indeed validates the key at the time of setting it
instead of doing lazy validation later. This makes sense, so we can
keep this promise and just expose the validation result to the caller.
Another downside of this is that the API just got more complicated.
But it not provides a validation API, that we previously did not have.
(cherry picked from commit d7bc1750c1)
For now only add the core settings, no peers' data.
To support peers and the allowed-ips of the peers is more complicated
and will be done later. It's more complicated because these are nested
lists (allowed-ips) inside a list (peers). That is quite unusual and to
conveniently support that in D-Bus API, in keyfile format, in libnm,
and nmcli, is a effort.
Also, it's further complicated by the fact that each peer has a secret (the
preshared-key). Thus we probably need secret flags for each peer, which
is a novelty as well (until now we require a fixed set of secrets per
profile that is well known).
