Normalizing can be complicated, as settings depend on each other and possibly
conflict.
That is, because verify() must exactly anticipate whether normalization will
succeed and how the result will look like. That is because we only want to
modify the connection, if we are sure that the result will verify.
Hence, verify() and normalize() are strongly related. The implementation
should not be spread out between NMSettingOvsInterface:verify(),
NMSettingOvsPatch:verify() and _normalize_ovs_interface_type().
Also, add some unit-tests.
When the user sets a GSM or CDMA setting along with a Bluetooth setting
we know we're dealing with a DUN profile. No need to ask.
[thaller@redhat.com: verify() and normalize() must strongly agree whether a
connection is normalizable, and now to do it. That is, after verify()
determines the connection is normalizable, normalize() must fix it as
anticipated.
The reason is, we only want to modify the connection, if we are able
to create a valid result. Hence, after normalize() it *must* verify().
Try to simplify that by moving the logic of fixing the bt-type to a
common place _nm_connection_detect_bluetooth_type().]
Co-Authored-By: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
nm_setting_verify() took a GSList of other NMSettings, but really it
would just be simpler all around to pass the NMConnection instead...
This means that several formerly NMSetting-branded functions that
operated on lists-of-settings now get replaced with
NMConnection-branded functions instead.
