Make notes on sandstorm.io somewhat more accurate
Sandstorm actually requires userns today; it doesn't use a setuid helper. I adjusted the text to reflect the e-mail conversation I had with @cgwalters a few months ago. Closes: #89 Approved by: cgwalters
This commit is contained in:
12
README.md
12
README.md
@@ -157,10 +157,14 @@ such.
|
||||
Related project comparison: Sandstorm.io
|
||||
----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
[Sandstorm.io](https://sandstorm.io/) also has a setuid helper
|
||||
process. @cgwalters believes their setuid code is fairly good, but it
|
||||
could still make sense to unify on bubblewrap as a setuid core. That
|
||||
hasn't been ruled out, but neither is it being actively pursued today.
|
||||
[Sandstorm.io](https://sandstorm.io/) requries unprivileged user
|
||||
namespaces to set up its sandbox, though it could easily be adapted
|
||||
to operate in a setuid mode as well. @cgwalters believes their code is
|
||||
fairly good, but it could still make sense to unify on bubblewrap.
|
||||
However, @kentonv (of Sandstorm) feels that while this makes sense
|
||||
in principle, the switching cost outweighs the practical benefits for
|
||||
now. This decision could be re-evaluated in the future, but it is not
|
||||
being actively pursued today.
|
||||
|
||||
Related project comparison: runc/binctr
|
||||
----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user