nixos/doc/rl-2211.section.md: changes w.r.t. cross check execution

This commit is contained in:
sternenseemann 2022-04-28 16:52:25 +02:00
parent c6cbef9aec
commit 1f8bae43e4
2 changed files with 47 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -13,8 +13,22 @@
<itemizedlist spacing="compact">
<listitem>
<para>
Please remove this line when you add the first item since
docbook requires the section to be non-empty
During cross-compilation, tests are now executed if the test
suite can be executed by the build platform. This is the case
when doing “native” cross-compilation where the build and host
platforms are largely the same, but the nixpkgs cross
compilation infrastructure is used, e.g.
<literal>pkgsStatic</literal> and <literal>pkgsLLVM</literal>.
Another possibility is that the build platform is a superset
of the host platform, e.g. when cross-compiling from
<literal>x86_64-unknown-linux</literal> to
<literal>i686-unknown-linux</literal>. The predicate gating
test suite execution is the newly added
<literal>canExecute</literal> predicate: You can e.g. check if
<literal>stdenv.buildPlatform</literal> can execute binaries
built for <literal>stdenv.hostPlatform</literal> (i.e.
produced by <literal>stdenv.cc</literal>) by evaluating
<literal>stdenv.buildPlatform.canExecute stdenv.hostPlatform</literal>.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
@ -35,8 +49,19 @@
<itemizedlist spacing="compact">
<listitem>
<para>
Please remove this line when you add the first item since
docbook requires the section to be non-empty
The <literal>isCompatible</literal> predicate checking CPU
compatibility is no longer exposed by the platform sets
generated using <literal>lib.systems.elaborate</literal>. In
most cases you will want to use the new
<literal>canExecute</literal> predicate instead which also
considers the kernel / syscall interface. It is briefly
described in the releases
<link linkend="sec-release-22.11-highlights">highlights
section</link>.
<literal>lib.systems.parse.isCompatible</literal> still
exists, but has changed semantically: Architectures with
differing endianness modes are <emphasis>no longer considered
compatible</emphasis>.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>

View File

@ -6,7 +6,16 @@ Support is planned until the end of June 2023, handing over to 23.05.
In addition to numerous new and upgraded packages, this release has the following highlights:
- Please remove this line when you add the first item since docbook requires the section to be non-empty
- During cross-compilation, tests are now executed if the test suite can be executed
by the build platform. This is the case when doing “native” cross-compilation
where the build and host platforms are largely the same, but the nixpkgs' cross
compilation infrastructure is used, e.g. `pkgsStatic` and `pkgsLLVM`. Another
possibility is that the build platform is a superset of the host platform, e.g. when
cross-compiling from `x86_64-unknown-linux` to `i686-unknown-linux`.
The predicate gating test suite execution is the newly added `canExecute`
predicate: You can e.g. check if `stdenv.buildPlatform` can execute binaries
built for `stdenv.hostPlatform` (i.e. produced by `stdenv.cc`) by evaluating
`stdenv.buildPlatform.canExecute stdenv.hostPlatform`.
<!-- To avoid merge conflicts, consider adding your item at an arbitrary place in the list instead. -->
@ -18,7 +27,14 @@ In addition to numerous new and upgraded packages, this release has the followin
## Backward Incompatibilities {#sec-release-22.11-incompatibilities}
- Please remove this line when you add the first item since docbook requires the section to be non-empty
- The `isCompatible` predicate checking CPU compatibility is no longer exposed
by the platform sets generated using `lib.systems.elaborate`. In most cases
you will want to use the new `canExecute` predicate instead which also
considers the kernel / syscall interface. It is briefly described in the
release's [highlights section](#sec-release-22.11-highlights).
`lib.systems.parse.isCompatible` still exists, but has changed semantically:
Architectures with differing endianness modes are *no longer considered compatible*.
<!-- To avoid merge conflicts, consider adding your item at an arbitrary place in the list instead. -->
## Other Notable Changes {#sec-release-22.11-notable-changes}