these changes were generated with nixq 0.0.2, by running
nixq ">> lib.mdDoc[remove] Argument[keep]" --batchmode nixos/**.nix
nixq ">> mdDoc[remove] Argument[keep]" --batchmode nixos/**.nix
nixq ">> Inherit >> mdDoc[remove]" --batchmode nixos/**.nix
two mentions of the mdDoc function remain in nixos/, both of which
are inside of comments.
Since lib.mdDoc is already defined as just id, this commit is a no-op as
far as Nix (and the built manual) is concerned.
Without sort-keys specified on entries, the entries are sorted only by
file name (in decreasing order, so starting at the end of the alphabet!),
without taking any other fields into account (see
[the boot loader specification reference][1]).
Moreover, entries without a sort-key are always ordered after all
entries with a sort-key, so by not adding a sort-key to the NixOS ones,
we cannot add a sort-key to any other entry while keeping it below the
NixOS entries.
So currently we have options to set the file names for additional entries like
memtest and netbootxyz.
However, as mentioned above, the sorting by file name is not very intuitive and
actually sorts in the opposite order of what is currently mentioned in the option
descriptions.
With this commit, we set a configurable sort-key on all NixOS entries,
and add options for setting the sort-keys for the memtest and netbootxyz
entries.
The sorting by sort-key is more intuitive (it starts at the start of the
alphabet) and also takes into account the machine-id and version for entries
with identical sort-keys.
We use a bootspec extension to store the sort keys, which allows us to
redefine the sort key for individual specialisations without needing any
special casing.
[1]: https://uapi-group.org/specifications/specs/boot_loader_specification/#sorting
Since we are not in a `callPackage` context, dependencies in
`nativeBuildInputs` don't get spliced to the buildPlatform, causing a
cross-compiled nixos system to fail at this step when running mypy built
for the hostPlatform.
This makes it easier to reason about what variables are inserted during packaging.
We also make sure that template file is also valid python syntax, which makes editor errors go away during development.
A bootspec could remove the `initrdSecrets` attribute and is a perfectly valid bootspec, as can be seen
in the bootspec.cue.
This makes the builder not fail upon missing `initrdSecrets`.
When `config.boot.zfs.enableUnstable` is set to true, grub was built with the `zfs` package even though the rest of the system uses the `zfsUnstable` package.
The effect of this can only be seen when `zfs` and `zfsUnstable` actually differ (which is not currently the case), for example when overriding one of them locally.
8f2babd032 was partially reverted by mistake. Original message below
---
On some systems, EFI variables are not supported or otherwise wonky.
bootctl attempting to access them causes failures during bootloader
installations and updates. For such systems, NixOS provides the options
`boot.loader.efi.canTouchEfiVariables` and
`boot.loader.systemd-boot.graceful` which pass flags to bootctl that
change whether and how EFI variables are accessed.
Previously, these flags were only passed to bootctl during an install
operation. However, they also apply during an update operation, which
can cause the same sorts of errors. This change passes the flags during
update operations as well to prevent those errors.
Fixes https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/151336
This reverts commit 80665d606a.
Parsing the package version broke our systemd-boot builder test.
i.e. it won't be able to parse systemd-boot efi binaries coming from
ubuntu
We no longer use the faulty systemd-boot version so this code should no
longer be needed.
Before this commit there was no way to access (boot into) specialisation of previous generations from grub,even tho they are there.
This commit will add grub submenu for each generation if the generation has any specialisation.
Which will allow you to boot into them.
Co-authored-by: Samuel Dionne-Riel <samuel@dionne-riel.com>
There is only other `with` with a somewhat broad scope, `with pkgs`, but
it's used in a place where it would become awkward to change out. And
anyway its scope is rather limited still.
With a limited testing of all packaged GRUB 2 themes (pkgs.nixos-grub2-theme)
this is tested to work.
Without this change, the theme loading will error out (waiting for a key press).
With this change, the theme loads and works as expected.
The intent was to not pass the flag when installing as removable. In
reality there is a third case, where you may not want to touch EFI
variables, and not want to install as removable.
In that case, it would install to the generic \EFI\grub\grubx64.efi,
which is not a good choice in any cases. The operating system should
"own" their path under \EFI\ to be a good citizen [citation needed].
With this change, there can be only two paths GRUB can be installed to:
- \EFI\NixOS-boot\grubx64.efi
- \EFI\BOOT\bootx64.efi
This removes the surprising behaviour where GRUB may be installed to a
different location only because we configured NixOS not to touch EFI
variables.
It may be necessary under some configurations to install GRUB without
touching EFI variables, but to the NixOS-owned location.
The whole option set was recommended against since mid-2019, and never
worked with the Raspberry Pi 4 family of devices.
We should have deprecated it in early 2020 for removal by 2021. At the
time I did not feel confident in making such a decision, and never
ended-up getting around to it.
The ***only*** supported-by-NixOS boot methods for AArch64 are
standards-based boot methods, namely UEFI or the pragmatically
almost-standard extlinux-compatible for U-Boot.
You can quote me on that.
