blog: anarchy: consider broad coordination role of govt.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ justification of a state in its various forms, and he takes the logician's appro
|
|||||||
identify a set of axioms, use these axioms to derive
|
identify a set of axioms, use these axioms to derive
|
||||||
greater structures like contract law, and enforcement (protection and compensation)
|
greater structures like contract law, and enforcement (protection and compensation)
|
||||||
and then later to prove other structures (redistribution) are incompatible with these axioms.
|
and then later to prove other structures (redistribution) are incompatible with these axioms.
|
||||||
by doing this, he outlines the possibilities of a state and concentrates the answer to
|
by doing this, he outlines the possibilities of a state and reduces the scope of
|
||||||
"is this complex system just" to "do you, reader, find these axioms just".
|
"is this complex system just" to that of "do you, reader, find these axioms just".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
the end result still has some amount of subjectivity, but the process is illuminating
|
the end result still has some amount of subjectivity, but the process is illuminating
|
||||||
and provides some compelling insights. i'm going to document my current thoughts on this
|
and provides some compelling insights. i'm going to document my current thoughts on this
|
||||||
@@ -28,5 +28,31 @@ topic, taken sometimes directly from Nozick's book and other times simply inspir
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Purpose of a state
|
## Purpose of a state
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
the State is something most of us are simply born into. we take it foregranted,
|
||||||
|
but why _does_ it exist? charitable takes first, uncharitable takes later in the article.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
a common explanation is that the State accomplishes things which individuals alone cannot,
|
||||||
|
and that these things are generally good. national defense; providing consistent/uniform expectations around rights;
|
||||||
|
education; perhaps a social safety net;
|
||||||
|
maybe even harm-reduction via regulations around safety or medical treatments.
|
||||||
|
generously: it's a tool by which we overcome large-scale coordination problems.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
but *is it* broadly effective at overcoming coordination problems?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
the irony is that US presidential approval has [averaged below 50%](https://news.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historical-statistics-trends.aspx) for two decades now.
|
||||||
|
the believe that the federal government will "do what is right" has sat [below 50%](https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/05/17/public-trust-in-government-1958-2021/) _for fifty years_.
|
||||||
|
[since 2006](https://news.gallup.com/poll/244094/majority-say-third-party-needed.aspx) more American's than not believe neither of the big two parties do an adequate job of representing people, and that a third major party is needed.
|
||||||
|
if US democracy were broadly effective at overcoming coordination problems, then _surely_ it would enable these majority positions to coordinate at the very base level of its operation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Notes (TODO: delete)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
US popular support for marijuana legalization is sitting at [68%](https://news.gallup.com/poll/356939/support-legal-marijuana-holds-record-high.aspx).
|
||||||
|
it's been the majority position for a decade now, and it's _defacto_ legal in most regions. but the federal government technically outlaws it -- simultaneously failing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
TODO: utlitarian? tool for coordination?.. no, not everyone can agree on its purpose,
|
TODO: utlitarian? tool for coordination?.. no, not everyone can agree on its purpose,
|
||||||
so we can't derive it in a top-down (end-goal driven) manner.
|
so we can't derive it in a top-down (end-goal driven) manner.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
TODO: nuclear disarmament, climate change, examples of coordination failure beyond the state
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user