docs: add installation note about the antivirus issue

This commit is contained in:
tomasklaen
2023-12-06 23:33:06 +01:00
parent bc9d20cb1a
commit 472cbb1648

View File

@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ Features:
_**NOTE**: If this command is run in an mpv installation directory with `portable_config`, it'll install there instead of `AppData`._
_**NOTE2**: The downloaded archive might trigger false positives in some antiviruses. This is explained in [FAQ below](#why-is-the-release-reported-as-malicious-by-some-antiviruses)._
### Linux & macOS
_Requires **curl** and **unzip**._
@@ -752,9 +754,11 @@ Then you wouldn't be able to sync your mpv config between platforms and everythi
#### Why is the release reported as malicious by some antiviruses?
Some obscure antiviruses find our binaries suspicious due to the way go packages them. I think the only way to solve that would be to sign them (not 100% sure though), but I'm not paying to work on free stuff. If anyone is bothered by this, and would be willing to donate a code signing certificate, let me know.
Some antiviruses find our binaries suspicious due to the way go packages them. This is a known issue with all go binaries (https://go.dev/doc/faq#virus). I think the only way to solve that would be to sign them (not 100% sure though), but I'm not paying to work on free stuff. If anyone is bothered by this, and would be willing to donate a code signing certificate, let me know.
If you want to check the binaries are safe, the code is in `src/ziggy`, and you can build them yourself by running `tools/build ziggy` in the repository root and compare.
If you want to check the binaries are safe, the code is in `src/ziggy`, and you can build them yourself by running `tools/build ziggy` in the repository root.
We might eventually rewrite it in something else.
#### Why _uosc_?