cdma: use consistent terminology for registration

This commit is contained in:
Dan Williams
2009-10-11 11:24:41 -07:00
parent 665d1847a8
commit 19b7c8fef1
2 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ reg_state_css_response (MMModemCdma *cdma,
MMModem *modem = info->modem;
/* We'll get an error if the SID isn't valid, so detect that and
* report unknown registration status.
* report unknown registration state.
*/
if (error) {
if ( (error->domain == MM_MOBILE_ERROR)
@@ -839,10 +839,10 @@ reg_state_css_response (MMModemCdma *cdma,
}
/* SID is valid; let subclasses figure out roaming and detailed registration */
if (MM_GENERIC_CDMA_GET_CLASS (modem)->query_registration_status) {
MM_GENERIC_CDMA_GET_CLASS (modem)->query_registration_status (MM_GENERIC_CDMA (modem),
reg_state_query_done,
info);
if (MM_GENERIC_CDMA_GET_CLASS (modem)->query_registration_state) {
MM_GENERIC_CDMA_GET_CLASS (modem)->query_registration_state (MM_GENERIC_CDMA (modem),
reg_state_query_done,
info);
} else {
reg_state_query_done (modem,
MM_MODEM_CDMA_REGISTRATION_STATE_REGISTERED,
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ get_registration_state (MMModemCdma *modem,
}
info = mm_callback_info_uint_new (MM_MODEM (modem), callback, user_data);
/* Prefer secondary port for registration status */
/* Prefer secondary port for registration state */
mm_serial_port_queue_command (priv->secondary ? priv->secondary : priv->primary,
"+CAD?",
3,

View File

@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ typedef struct {
typedef struct {
MMModemBaseClass parent;
void (*query_registration_status) (MMGenericCdma *self,
MMModemUIntFn callback,
gpointer user_data);
void (*query_registration_state) (MMGenericCdma *self,
MMModemUIntFn callback,
gpointer user_data);
} MMGenericCdmaClass;
GType mm_generic_cdma_get_type (void);