CONTRIBUTING: update comment about requiring LGPL-2.1+ license instead of LGPL-2.0+
Historically, libnm claimed to be LGPL-2.0+ licensed. But as keep mixing that with LGPL-2.1+ code (e.g. from systemd), so probably even the parts that claimed to be LGPL-2.0+, were not entirely correctly doing so. Anyway, since we switched to SPDX license identifiers, we now claim everywhere that the right license is LGPL-2.1+. Update the comment to reflect that.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ Legal
|
||||
-----
|
||||
|
||||
NetworkManager is partly licensed under terms of GNU Lesser General Public License
|
||||
version 2 or later (LGPL-2.0+). That is for example the case for libnm.
|
||||
version 2 or later (LGPL-2.1+). That is for example the case for libnm.
|
||||
For historical reasons, the daemon itself is licensed under terms of GNU General
|
||||
Public License, version 2 or later (GPL-2.0+). See the license comment in the source
|
||||
files.
|
||||
Note that all new contributions to NetworkManager MUST be made under terms of
|
||||
LGPL-2.0+, that is also the case for parts that are currently licensed GPL-2.0+.
|
||||
LGPL-2.1+, that is also the case for parts that are currently licensed GPL-2.0+.
|
||||
The reason for that is that we might eventually relicense everything as LGPL and
|
||||
new contributions already must agree with that future change.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user