CONTRIBUTING: update comment about requiring LGPL-2.1+ license instead of LGPL-2.0+

Historically, libnm claimed to be LGPL-2.0+ licensed. But as keep mixing that
with LGPL-2.1+ code (e.g. from systemd), so probably even the parts that
claimed to be LGPL-2.0+, were not entirely correctly doing so.

Anyway, since we switched to SPDX license identifiers, we now claim
everywhere that the right license is LGPL-2.1+. Update the comment to
reflect that.
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Haller
2019-09-25 09:52:36 +02:00
parent e150307ab5
commit 3c36231706

View File

@@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ Legal
----- -----
NetworkManager is partly licensed under terms of GNU Lesser General Public License NetworkManager is partly licensed under terms of GNU Lesser General Public License
version 2 or later (LGPL-2.0+). That is for example the case for libnm. version 2 or later (LGPL-2.1+). That is for example the case for libnm.
For historical reasons, the daemon itself is licensed under terms of GNU General For historical reasons, the daemon itself is licensed under terms of GNU General
Public License, version 2 or later (GPL-2.0+). See the license comment in the source Public License, version 2 or later (GPL-2.0+). See the license comment in the source
files. files.
Note that all new contributions to NetworkManager MUST be made under terms of Note that all new contributions to NetworkManager MUST be made under terms of
LGPL-2.0+, that is also the case for parts that are currently licensed GPL-2.0+. LGPL-2.1+, that is also the case for parts that are currently licensed GPL-2.0+.
The reason for that is that we might eventually relicense everything as LGPL and The reason for that is that we might eventually relicense everything as LGPL and
new contributions already must agree with that future change. new contributions already must agree with that future change.